Burntide Official Website › Blog › Pack size and the 60-day window

How Many Jars To Buy First: Pack Size And The 60-Day Window

Reviewed by Dr. Alexis David, MD

Every supplement sold in bundles has the same quiet mismatch inside it, and almost no sales page draws attention to it. The pack the seller recommends and the window the seller guarantees are measured on different scales, and the gap between them is where most of the regret in this category lives.

Two clocks that do not line up

The Burntide guarantee runs sixty days from the date of purchase. That is a good term, longer than much of the category offers, and it is genuinely long enough to test the product. The recommended pack is six jars, which is 180 days of gummies at one a day.

Sixty and one hundred and eighty. The guarantee covers a third of what the seller suggests you buy, and it covers the same sixty days regardless of which row you picked.

• Clock one, the supply. 30 gummies a jar, one a day, so a jar is a month. One jar is 30 days, three are 90, six are 180.
• Clock two, the window. Sixty days from purchase, not from delivery, and not from the first gummy. A few days of shipping come out of it.
• The overlap. Two jars. That is the most anyone can consume inside the window on any pack.

The arithmetic, pack by pack

Take each row and ask the same two questions: what does it cost a day, and what does it cost if the answer turns out to be no.

One jar, $89

$2.97 a day, the highest on the ladder, and the cheapest possible way to find out. Thirty days sits entirely inside the sixty-day window with a month to spare, so you can take the whole jar, think about it for a fortnight and still call the desk in time. If the answer is no, you are out $89 and a postage stamp.

Three jars, $177

$1.97 a day, and a third of the price per day off the single jar. You will have used about two jars by the deadline. The third is the one you are betting on, and it is about $59 of bet. This is a reasonable row for somebody fairly confident but not certain.

Six jars, $294

$1.63 a day, the cheapest row and the one with the bonuses and the free shipping. It is also 180 days of a product you have not tried, with the window closing at day sixty and four jars unopened. As a second order it is the obvious choice. As a first order it is a $196 bet on a product you have used for eight weeks.

What the reviews say about timing

Burntidedaily publishes eight named buyers with the day each one wrote. That is unusually specific for this category and it is worth using.

• The earliest review was written at day 16.
• The latest was written at day 43.
• Five of the eight wrote between day 26 and day 43.
• Nobody wrote in week one.
• The distributor puts the most commonly reported wait at three to four weeks.

Every one of those dates is comfortably inside sixty days. That is the useful finding: this is a product you can genuinely judge before the window closes, which is not true of a thirty-day guarantee and is the strongest term on the offer.

The uncomfortable finding sits beside it. Five of the eight rated it three stars, said they had wanted a faster change, called the order desk and stopped at two jars. Two of those five had bought the six-jar pack. Their experience is the argument this post is making, written by people who paid for it.

What the sales page recommends, and why

It is worth being fair to the seller here, because the recommendation is not irrational and understanding it makes the counter-argument stronger.

The official page recommends six jars, and gives two reasons. The first is value, which is true: $1.63 a day is a third less than the single-jar rate for identical gummies. The second is consistency, which is also defensible: an ingredient that is reported to take three to four weeks is not going to be judged fairly by somebody who runs out in week four and waits a fortnight before reordering.

There is a commercial reason as well, and it is not a secret. A larger first order is worth more to every party in the chain, including this desk, which earns when you buy. That is disclosed on the about page along with the places this site argues against it, and this post is one of them.

The counter-argument is not that the reasoning is wrong. It is that the reasoning assumes the product suits you, and a first order is precisely the purchase where that has not been established. Buy the value once you know. Buy the question as cheaply as you can while it is still a question.

A 60-day plan

If you buy, use the window deliberately rather than letting it expire. This is what that looks like.

The only step that cannot be recovered is the last one. Opening a claim on day fifty-five and posting the parcel on day sixty-two is a normal sequence and the desk will handle it. Noticing on day sixty-five is not recoverable, which is why day fifty is on that list rather than day fifty-nine.

When the six-jar pack is right

Three situations, and they are all real.

1. A second order. You took a jar, it suited you, you want the cheapest rate. The 180 days is no longer a bet.
2. Two people in the house. Two adults at one gummy a day turns 180 gummies into 90 days, which lines up far better with a sixty-day window. The sales page does not mention this and it is the cleanest case for the pack.
3. You want the guides and the free postage and you have done the sums. Three digital guides the seller values at $141 and free US shipping only appear on this row. Price the pack without them first; if it still works, the extras are a bonus.

What is not a good reason is the saving on the row. $600 off $894 is a comparison against a list price the seller chose, and the FTC's guidance on health product advertising sets out what a seller should be able to substantiate (the FTC's health products guidance).

The return postage problem

One practical detail decides how a refund feels, and it is the same on every pack in this category: the buyer pays return postage.

On a single jar that is a small padded envelope. On six jars it is a box, and a heavy one, sent tracked across the country at your own cost. Nothing about that is unusual or unfair, and it is worth knowing before you choose a row rather than after.

• Use a tracked service. An untracked parcel that does not arrive cannot be credited.
• Put your full name, email and order ID inside the parcel. Without them it is an anonymous box of jars.
• Call the desk before you post, not after. The call is what timestamps the claim inside the window.

The verdict

Buy the smallest pack first unless you already know the product suits you. That is the conclusion, it costs this desk money to print, and it is what the arithmetic and the published reviews both point at.

The ladder in this category is designed to reward a second order, and it does that well: $1.63 a day is a genuinely lower rate for identical gummies. It rewards a first order much less well, because a first order is mostly a question and the cheapest way to ask a question is the smallest pack.

General guidance on evaluating supplements before buying is published by NCCIH, MedlinePlus and the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, whose review of the weight-loss category is the single most useful thing a buyer here can read. The pricing page has the same arithmetic beside the ladder itself.